|
|
Post by Shaxspear III Esq. on Apr 2, 2011 17:50:34 GMT -8
Fair enough. I have found a site where you can assign points and values for damn near everything. Still looking it over at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfhat on Apr 7, 2011 20:47:32 GMT -8
I watched the Canucks game tonight. I'm glad I recognized the team this time! I was worried for a moment that we'd be going into the post season playing like we did against the spOilers. It was great seeing Malhotra accepting the Presidents Trophy with Hank, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friendly Destroyer on Apr 7, 2011 20:49:50 GMT -8
You skatin' on thin ice here Wolfy! |
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 7, 2011 21:23:49 GMT -8
It's not like he called them  . |
|
|
|
Post by Friendly Destroyer on Apr 7, 2011 21:24:31 GMT -8
You go too far.
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 7, 2011 21:26:49 GMT -8
Sorry, you kinda set it up though.. I couldn't help it.
|
|
|
|
Post by J-Dawg on Apr 7, 2011 21:27:29 GMT -8
As opposed to the Calgary Shames?
(I'm a Habs fan, never liked the Flames).
|
|
|
|
Post by Friendly Destroyer on Apr 7, 2011 21:28:55 GMT -8
Sorry, you kinda set it up though.. I couldn't help it. I'm just kiddin' with you guys as I'm sure y'all were (right? Right? RIGHT?!!!) |
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 7, 2011 21:30:04 GMT -8
Right.
J-Dawg, my other team is the Bruins. The first round looks like it could be interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friendly Destroyer on Apr 7, 2011 21:34:01 GMT -8
Possible Hawks and Canucks first round sounds amazing (although most of the grit on the Chicago side that made those last series so good is gone).
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 7, 2011 21:36:48 GMT -8
I dread pretty much any of the possible match ups we could end up with in the first round. Chicago least of all, so I hope it stays that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Friendly Destroyer on Apr 7, 2011 21:38:53 GMT -8
Shutting down the Perry line in a best of seven will be easy, don't fret. Phoenix won't last a full best of seven either. I'd worry 'bout Chicago though.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfhat on Apr 7, 2011 23:16:13 GMT -8
The Blackhawks have an uncanny ability to fuck us up, but Friendly D is right when he says they've lost most of their grit. No more Buffy Luongo Slayer for them!
Either way, the plan is to spank the Flames in the Saddle Dome on Saturday and finally snuff their hopes of the 2011 playoffs. Ya see what I did thar?
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 7, 2011 23:42:09 GMT -8
The Blackhawks have an uncanny ability to fuck us up, but Friendly D is right when he says they've lost most of their grit. No more Buffy Luongo Slayer for them! Either way, the plan is to spank the Flames in the Saddle Dome on Saturday and finally snuff their hopes of the 2011 playoffs. Ya see what I did thar? I see what you did thar! The Flames are already statistically eliminated though. |
|
|
|
Post by wolfhat on Apr 8, 2011 15:36:16 GMT -8
Damn tie-breaker rules... I don't know them. Something about your record against the other team(s) in the tie and then maybe your goal differential. I don't care; my team gets home ice advantage in every round!
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 8, 2011 15:39:12 GMT -8
Basically the first tie breaker is wins, of which the flames will have the least out of the teams that could potentially finish with 95 points. The second tie breaker is goal differential.
|
|
|
|
Post by Shaxspear III Esq. on Apr 8, 2011 15:39:19 GMT -8
*sigh* Now that the Flames are gone and my girlfriend is a Nucks fan. Time to hop on the bandwagon I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 8, 2011 15:39:47 GMT -8
The weather is fair.
|
|
|
|
Post by wolfhat on Apr 8, 2011 15:48:41 GMT -8
Oh right, I always forget about wins v. OT losses. I think the current point system is flawed. It should be win=3, OT win=2, OT loss=1, and loss=0. I know it would fuck up stats and records and stuff, but they could be normalized and after a few years people wouldn't notice.
|
|
|
|
Post by emptyfox on Apr 8, 2011 15:59:50 GMT -8
The reason the above system (which I agree with) will never be adopted is because the playoff race is more exciting on the current system. The standings remain much tighter.
|
|
