HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 14:44:19 GMT -8
Yeah we call it sociables too- I think King's Cup is mostly americans and brits? No names is awesome, so is no swearing, but my favorite rule is that you take the name of the person across from you at the table. It gets amazingly confusing, especially coupled with the "you always have to speak in the third person" rule
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 14:06:57 GMT -8
We clearly need a sensitivity training course thread.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 14:01:24 GMT -8
My dad was killed by a werecar. my avatar offends me
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 13:47:25 GMT -8
I despised kid cudi
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 13:43:20 GMT -8
I found it and joined on FB
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 13:39:13 GMT -8
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 13:31:15 GMT -8
How in the deuce I never managed to see so many people in spandex boggles my mind. I clearly have to party with you folks at some point, I"ll look less out of place in my own 4 spandex outfits.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 13:01:08 GMT -8
It's too late now. Look at all the destruction your words have wrought!
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:47:09 GMT -8
-HG fails to understand meaning of the word unanimous -Others fail to understand the meaning of the word sensitive -New guy changes screen name
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:25:29 GMT -8
Don't worry schoolbus, my comment that I hoped people didn't find a man changing into a car sexist was for the exact same purpose- I think when people are so on the edge of their seat in wanting to find offense it kinda breezes past them.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:19:08 GMT -8
That was a poor time to make a grammatical error.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:18:25 GMT -8
It's true, I clearly write terrible. Thank you once again for your amazing and insightful input.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:17:18 GMT -8
That's fine. I can't say I really consider writing well and using big words or arguing like a philosopher an insult; in fact I think it's a pretty amazing compliment.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:13:45 GMT -8
I'm at work writing a manuscript for submission, sorry if academic babble leaks over into the way I type I here. That being said, I don't think that using smaller words is necessarily a good way to make an argument better.
And I wasn't planning on taking a swing at any one in any sense, my only even quasi rude comment regarding anyone specific was a stick-in-rectum remark. I leave the ad hominems to others.
And I'm a Psychology Master's student; not a philosophy undergrad, although I'm 2 courses short of my BA in Phil as well.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:04:18 GMT -8
Step 1: Want women Step 2: Step 3: Profit
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 11:01:21 GMT -8
Aww that hat profoundly makes me wish I still had my inflatable chicken costume. It looked so much like the family guy chicken. Was good for raves.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 10:51:53 GMT -8
Would the same consensual act between two partners where the woman was not being paid be considered objectification? What if the girl was really into it?
This is the slippery area I'm talking about- it's when the effects of things like pornography bleed over into things that directly effect your life that it becomes problematic. There are however people that are fully capable of discriminating between the two categories of behaviors.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 10:44:54 GMT -8
I'm sure it will be an end to the series. I could fully see Wes making another slasher series, but the Scream franchise needs to quit while it is (marginally) ahead.
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 10:41:50 GMT -8
As for finding sexism funny, I don't, except in limited comedic circumstances where context makes it funny. What I do find funny is the same reason I think the reaction to pedo-bear is amusing- it's the off the cuff over-reaction to anything that could be connected with what are legitimately problem behaviors
|
|
HecticDialectic
Howling Windigo
{S=0}Will Fuck for Sex
The spandex dream machine%\0\%
Posts: 447
|
Post by HecticDialectic on Apr 27, 2011 10:40:50 GMT -8
And those things *are* all objectification, which no one here is against or thinks is funny. Those aren't you choice, and as you mentioned they are imposed upon you despite the fact that you have just as much right to be respected as anyone else.
A pornstar's bouncing bum is *not* objectification, because it is voluntary- in fact said pornstar wouldn't make any money if men weren't willing to treat her like an object. It's a tricky grey area, but adding consensual behavior to the concept of objectification makes it a useless one- the problem is when it bleeds over into how we treat other people with whom we are not engage in a social contract where objectification is part of the deal.
|
|