|
Post by Drew on Feb 19, 2011 15:43:13 GMT -8
I don't take any of it so seriously that I feel the tension. If I did, know would have made me cry a long time ago.
|
|
|
Post by J. Walter Weatherman on Feb 19, 2011 16:44:00 GMT -8
If you take message boards 100% serious, you probably shouldn't be on the internet in any way. Just my 2.
|
|
Hancho
Howling Windigo
Likes Turtles
Posts: 463
|
Post by Hancho on Feb 19, 2011 23:35:49 GMT -8
I don't want all the fun reading material to go away!!!
HG, I actually enjoy those disruptive posts of yours. Hopefully, I'm not on yours or anybody else's ignore list after all that shit last month.
|
|
evanisovich
Grunting Yowie
Incorrect spawn ceased to metabolate
Posts: 163
|
Post by evanisovich on Feb 20, 2011 1:01:03 GMT -8
Don't worry about it; I've actually been considering turning "God" into a for "WSS." DOUBLE WORD OMG Ah shit, did we just divide by zero? *edit* ...and what if we ignored ourselves??
|
|
|
Post by Lump on Feb 20, 2011 9:28:06 GMT -8
Ignoring people would just end up confusing me.
|
|
|
Post by Horned Gramma on Feb 20, 2011 9:58:32 GMT -8
Nah Hancho, yr good in my book.
Posting pictures of your ferrets and changing your avatar to Ben Linus... Quite a coup.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine Sun Chips on Feb 20, 2011 13:20:41 GMT -8
Just to clarify after reading the ignore feature specs--we can see the posts of someone we've ignored if is quoted by someone else we haven't ignored. Correct? That's what I think I read, but I just wanted to make completely sure.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine Sun Chips on Feb 20, 2011 13:21:29 GMT -8
Not that I've ignored any of y'all, though. I was just curious.
|
|
|
Post by stamper on Feb 20, 2011 14:04:53 GMT -8
the only good thing about this ignoring feature is that it now gives me two ways to ignore CatSquatch... nevermind - ignoring people is bad!
|
|
|
Post by Lump on Feb 20, 2011 14:06:33 GMT -8
HIYO! The ol' ball 'n chain.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine Sun Chips on Feb 20, 2011 14:12:29 GMT -8
the only good thing about this ignoring feature is that it now gives me two ways to ignore CatSquatch... nevermind - ignoring people is bad! Eh, no matter stamps. I'm used to you ignoring me in person too. Fucker.
|
|
|
Post by Lump on Feb 20, 2011 14:18:52 GMT -8
'Dat Catsquatch got CLAWZZZ!
|
|
|
Post by Catherine Sun Chips on Feb 20, 2011 14:24:47 GMT -8
'Dat Catsquatch got CLAWZZZ! You know it! Imma redhead!
|
|
|
Post by Lump on Feb 20, 2011 14:26:27 GMT -8
fiyacracka!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2011 14:27:25 GMT -8
My mom's a redhead! Ended up with 5 kids with really really dark brown hair.
|
|
|
Post by interstateeight on Feb 20, 2011 14:28:40 GMT -8
Just to clarify after reading the ignore feature specs--we can see the posts of someone we've ignored if is quoted by someone else we haven't ignored. Correct? That's what I think I read, but I just wanted to make completely sure. I haven't subjected it to extensive testing, and I would urge people to not respond with examples (see original post on the subject of fomenting conflict), but I assume that's the case. Anyone who has used the feature and knows the answer, please PM me.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine Sun Chips on Feb 20, 2011 14:28:53 GMT -8
Thhhhaaaats me! That's why I wanted to go as cathy. But lumps is so much better!
|
|
|
Post by Lump on Feb 20, 2011 14:29:42 GMT -8
lumps keep makin' me think o' 'dat blackeyedpeez song.
|
|
|
Post by alex on Feb 21, 2011 13:59:24 GMT -8
i've found a major design flaw in this. It does not appear to work on loud annoying coworkers.
If you could please remedy this it would be GREATLY appreciated.
Sincerely,
Alex
|
|
|
Post by interstateeight on Feb 21, 2011 16:23:48 GMT -8
I looked through the code and found a solution, but it requires a little more independent user input. First, take the following image: Place it in your program of choice and make it approximately four or five inches in diameter. Print it out, approach your coworker with the paper in one hand and a roll of duct tape in the other, and let your instincts take over.
|
|