Sasquatch! Music Festival
« Post Message »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 24, 2013, 4:05am




Sasquatch! Music Festival :: Non-Sasquatch Discussion :: Music Related :: Post Message
Post Reply
Name:
Subject:
Terms of Service: I agree to the ProBoards Terms of Service
Security Check:
Message Icon: icon
Add Tags:
Add Smilies:
Message:
Expand
Characters Remaining:
Disable Smilies: If this box is checked, smiley emoticons will be disabled in your message.
shortcuts: hit alt+s to send, alt+p to preview, alt+c to spell check, or alt+r to reset


Topic Summary
Posted by weenie on Dec 1, 2011, 2:56am

Dec 1, 2011, 2:43am, Geno wrote:
Also, since when is Bon Iver a "new" artist? 5 years isn't really new.


We were just talking about that! While the Grammy's do this with someone each year (see Imogen Heap) this one is pretty funny. We were thinking it's because they were heavily involved in some pretty huge hip-hop this year. Maybe it brought them to the attention of some Grammy voting types who wouldn't have otherwise known of them? I sincerely doubt thete's Grammy voters on the lawn at 'squatch.
Posted by Pea on Dec 1, 2011, 2:58am
Maybe because the new album is on a major label? Do they even acknowledge independent releases?
Posted by matt on Dec 1, 2011, 7:41am
"To be eligible for Best New Artist, an artist has to have simply never won a Grammy before, have released at least one album (but not more than three), and have not been entered for Best New Artist more than three times (even as a member of a group)." Weird.
Posted by wompwomp on Dec 1, 2011, 9:49am
Adele is going to win ALL THE GRAMMIES
Posted by Cbats on Dec 1, 2011, 9:55am

Dec 1, 2011, 2:54am, andimac wrote:

Dec 1, 2011, 2:43am, Geno wrote:
Also, since when is Bon Iver a "new" artist? 5 years isn't really new.


More importantly, how are Mumford and Sons still getting nominations from an album that came out in 09?!?!??!?!



The cave was released as a single in late 2010 so it still qualifies according to grammy rules for some reason.

Posted by stamper on Dec 1, 2011, 10:50am

Dec 1, 2011, 9:49am, wompwomp wrote:
Adele is going to win ALL THE GRAMMIES


This
Posted by Horned Gramma on Dec 1, 2011, 11:09am
One - the Grammys are meaningless.

Two - they Dr. Garbanzoured out last year that the only way to stay relevant is to give the awards to artists indie kids care about, so you can count on Dillwax taking home at least a couple.

Three - I am starting my own music awards show: the Horned Grammys.
Posted by davers on Dec 1, 2011, 11:12am

Dec 1, 2011, 11:09am, Horned Gramma wrote:
Three - I am starting my own music awards show: the Horned Grammys.


I look forward to this. I think before you present the awards you should spend a few minutes saying why all the other nominees didnt win. There should also be lots of "Worst..." awards.
Posted by StormyPinkness on Dec 1, 2011, 11:52am

Dec 1, 2011, 12:08am, kymess_jr wrote:

Nov 30, 2011, 11:55pm, Cbats wrote:


Skrillex is now a 3 time grammy nominee



I've never paid attention to the grammys before, and I don't think I'll start now.


Yeah I was just wondering who gives shits about the Grammys?
Posted by Cbats on Dec 1, 2011, 11:56am
I'm not saying I put any merit in the Grammys artistically but I do find them interesting just as a way to gauge the acceptance of certain artists into mainstream. Plus I just like award shows way too much. It's the same reason I'm on a message board dedicated to talking about the possible lineup for a music festival (or at least it was at one point)
Posted by Gang Warily on Dec 1, 2011, 1:51pm

Dec 1, 2011, 11:09am, Horned Gramma wrote:
One - the Grammys are meaningless.

Two - they Dr. Garbanzoured out last year that the only way to stay relevant is to give the awards to artists indie kids care about, so you can count on Dillwax taking home at least a couple.

Three - I am starting my own music awards show: the Horned Grammys.


Can you imagine a trophy that has the Horned Gramma on top and it cackles "Give your granny a kissy kissy!"? It would scare the shit out of most people :P
Posted by Horned Gramma on Dec 1, 2011, 1:54pm
Nobody would want to win a Horned Grammy anyway. The implications are somehow far worse than what the statuette would look like, which I guarantee would absolutely be as horrifying as possible.
Posted by Gang Warily on Dec 1, 2011, 1:56pm

Dec 1, 2011, 1:54pm, Horned Gramma wrote:
Nobody would want to win a Horned Grammy anyway. The implications are somehow far worse than what the statuette would look like, which I guarantee would absolutely be as horrifying as possible.


Maybe we can get 1sttimer to expand her business and make Horned Gramma statues.
Posted by weenie on Dec 1, 2011, 2:22pm
[image]

In recognition of never having been nominated for a Grammy. Kudos!
Posted by LumpSquatch on Dec 2, 2011, 11:33am

Dec 1, 2011, 2:58am, Pea wrote:
Maybe because the new album is on a major label? Do they even acknowledge independent releases?


The Surburbs was released on Merge

Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Notice | FTC Disclosure | Report Abuse | Mobile