| Author | Topic: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases (Read 3,538 times) |
XhornedXgrammaX Administrator
     MVP member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1028.photobucket.com/albums/y342/HornedGramma/gramma3-1.png)
16% NICER THAN PREVIOUS MODELS
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
Joined: Jan 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 14,323
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #45 on Nov 17, 2010, 10:52am » | |
Sleigh Bells do NOT blow.
|
|
|
Cbats Snarling Mapinguary
     Pitchfork Super Fan member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.cbautomation.com/cbatsprj355/nit_asp/images/CBATS_Logo_500_236.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,596
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #46 on Nov 17, 2010, 12:19pm » | |
uh yeah sleigh bells are kind of awesome
|
Nov 2, 2011, 8:14pm, XhornedXgrammaX wrote:| If there's one single thing in the world that it is legitimately impossible to take the intellectual high ground on, it's fucking Skrillex. |
|
|
|
know ID yuh Abominable Snowman
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.gunthernet.com/images/thumbs/7.jpg)
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3,327 Location: Portland
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #47 on Nov 17, 2010, 2:06pm » | |
Sleigh Bells are all sorts of awesome. I bought a ticket to the Black Keys next month, who I have zero interest in seeing live again, just because Sleigh Bells are opening.
|
|
|
Pea Global Moderator
     Glowtarded member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i45.tinypic.com/smd8aa.jpg)
Joined: Feb 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 13,591 Location: District 9
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #48 on Nov 17, 2010, 3:48pm » | |
Sleigh Bells instantly went from being 2010's biggest buzz band to 2010's most hated band because of their overnight success. I'm pretty tired of the CD (probably because I listened to it 50 times in a row) but I really wanna see them bad!
|
Mar 3, 2013, 6:13pm, Dr. Garbanzo wrote:| Its a Sasquatch Dr. Garbanzohting a bear Dr. Garbanzohting a Sasquatch. |
|
|
|
parenthesees Yapping Skunk Ape
 member is offline
Joined: Feb 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 93
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #49 on Nov 18, 2010, 2:37pm » | |
Welllllllllllll, now that the Foo Dr. Garbanzohters are playing I think Radiohead is highly unlikely.
| |
|
XhornedXgrammaX Administrator
     MVP member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1028.photobucket.com/albums/y342/HornedGramma/gramma3-1.png)
16% NICER THAN PREVIOUS MODELS
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
Joined: Jan 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 14,323
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #50 on Nov 18, 2010, 2:53pm » | |
Why?
I mean, they're not going to be there but one doesn't really have anything to do with the other.
|
|
|
LumpSquatch Roaring Meh-Teh
     Maple Syrup Dick member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i43.tinypic.com/w72bm.jpg)
Joined: Dec 2011 Gender: Male  Posts: 5,336
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #51 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:01pm » | |
Guessing they probably blew there load money-wise on Foo Dr. Garbanzohters. But to be honest, I don't really see Foo being that expensive.
|
|
|
emptyfox Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m09kbs7edd1r94e9jo1_500.gif)
PRIMUS SUCKS
Joined: Mar 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 5,689
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #52 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:04pm » | |
Ya, I would agree lumpy. Radiohead, Daft Punk et al. would most likely sell out the gorge on their own. I don't feel like Foo Dr. Garbanzohters could do that these days...
|
|
|
XhornedXgrammaX Administrator
     MVP member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1028.photobucket.com/albums/y342/HornedGramma/gramma3-1.png)
16% NICER THAN PREVIOUS MODELS
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
Joined: Jan 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 14,323
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #53 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:09pm » | |
Sersiously guys. If Foo Dr. Garbanzohters is the biggest name on the bill we've got bigger things to worry about than not having Radiohead again.
|
|
|
parenthesees Yapping Skunk Ape
 member is offline
Joined: Feb 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 93
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #54 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:12pm » | |
Nov 18, 2010, 2:53pm, XhornedXgrammaX wrote:Why?
I mean, they're not going to be there but one doesn't really have anything to do with the other. |
|
Yeah I was just assuming they cost a crap-ton of money to book, but based on what some other people said, maybe they don't cost a lot. Maybe they are like the Pavement of 2011 assuming everything in 2011 is bigger scale (bigger throwback rock band shows, more days, etc.)
| |
|
Cbats Snarling Mapinguary
     Pitchfork Super Fan member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.cbautomation.com/cbatsprj355/nit_asp/images/CBATS_Logo_500_236.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,596
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #55 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:32pm » | |
It really feels like you guys aren't trying sometimes:
FOO Dr. GarbanzoHTERS 300K+ No college dates at this time more info (from the link i posted on page 2)
aka the foo Dr. Garbanzohters probably cost the same as all three headliners from last year combined. It probably won't effect much though because I imagine Friday with be a short day so they can spend a ton of money on the headliner and only book 4-5 other bands.
|
Nov 2, 2011, 8:14pm, XhornedXgrammaX wrote:| If there's one single thing in the world that it is legitimately impossible to take the intellectual high ground on, it's fucking Skrillex. |
|
|
|
XhornedXgrammaX Administrator
     MVP member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1028.photobucket.com/albums/y342/HornedGramma/gramma3-1.png)
16% NICER THAN PREVIOUS MODELS
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
Joined: Jan 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 14,323
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #56 on Nov 18, 2010, 3:38pm » | |
|
|
|
interstateeight Human
 member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i472.photobucket.com/albums/rr88/coug1313/sasquatchchristmasfinal.gif)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 1 Location: San Francisco
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #57 on Nov 18, 2010, 4:24pm » | |
ONCE AGAIN
UNLESS YOU HAVE THE FESTIVAL'S FINANCIAL BOOKS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
SPECULATION ON WHAT THEY CAN AND CANNOT AFFORD IS POINTLESS AND KINDA STUPID
|
|
|
Pea Global Moderator
     Glowtarded member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i45.tinypic.com/smd8aa.jpg)
Joined: Feb 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 13,591 Location: District 9
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #58 on Nov 18, 2010, 4:31pm » | |
i fucking love I8 sometimes
|
Mar 3, 2013, 6:13pm, Dr. Garbanzo wrote:| Its a Sasquatch Dr. Garbanzohting a bear Dr. Garbanzohting a Sasquatch. |
|
|
|
emptyfox Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m09kbs7edd1r94e9jo1_500.gif)
PRIMUS SUCKS
Joined: Mar 2010 Gender: Male  Posts: 5,689
|  | Re: Radiohead @ Sasquatch - likelihood increases « Reply #59 on Nov 18, 2010, 4:53pm » | |
Nov 18, 2010, 4:24pm, interstateeight wrote:ONCE AGAIN
UNLESS YOU HAVE THE FESTIVAL'S FINANCIAL BOOKS AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
SPECULATION ON WHAT THEY CAN AND CANNOT AFFORD IS POINTLESS AND KINDA STUPID |
|
THANK YOU!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
| |
|