|
 Author | Topic: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors (Read 31,333 times) |
funnygrrl
Howling Windigo
member is offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 290
|  | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #270 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:04pm » | |
Maybe sonic youth and thom yorke
| |
|
coren
Howling Windigo
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Gender: Male 
Posts: 313
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #271 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:05pm » | |
If this "unproven headliners" rumor is true, I don't think we could count Sonic Youth in
| |
|
emstack
Human
member is offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 12
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #272 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:15pm » | |
Feb 15, 2010, 9:35pm, interstateeight wrote:
Feb 15, 2010, 9:31pm, emstack wrote:
Hate to burst the bubble yet again, but my source explicitly stated Arcade Fire ain't on the bill and that Pavement is not headlining.
|
|
Don't talk about bubble-bursting until the official lineup is out and you have transitioned from "random dude with a posting history in the single digits talking about his mysteriously connected friend" to "credible source to whom we can look for information in the future." |
|
I feel like I've made the big time with insterstateeight responding! I don't give a shit if any of you believe any of what I say, but it's nuts to take "unproven" and "not US" from my post and act as if that's fact but not take my concrete confirmations (no Arcade Fire and Pavement not headlining), too. If you're going to pick and chose what to believe, why not at least take the things my source was willing to be explicit about instead of his abstract and hard-to-define hints?
I already apologized for not having more information or more evidence so if you feel the need to criticize my willingness to not fuck over a friend just for props from a message board community, refer to that.
I'm not in the business of sidetracking threads, so I'll include one more hint that my source gave me that makes no sense to me. I fear he might just be pulling my leg with this one. But, hell, why not.
"Those looking forward to the band Pavement leads into probably won't want Sunday to come slow."
Is that even a hint? Maybe that Pavement is on Sunday not Monday...
| |
|
alex
Guest
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #273 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:23pm » | |
I look at it like this. With no credentials, names, etc., nobody will believe you until you prove that you're a credible source. This isn't a shot at you, it's just how the world works. I could send in hundreds of tips to CoS saying that I spoke to the lead singer of Band X about headlining Sasquatch, but unless they can trust that the info is accurate they won't print it. Same thing here. Nobody's giving you shit, but at the same time you can't expect people to take your word as gospel just because you say you've got a source.
| |
|
alex
Guest
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #274 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:24pm » | |
says the guy with 7 posts
| |
|
alpenhows
Yapping Skunk Ape
member is offline
![[avatar]](http://s-ak.buzzfed.com/static/imagebuzz/terminal01/2011/1/18/16/the-babysitters-club-with-dogs-1368-1295385090-32.jpg "[avatar]")
Joined: Jan 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 66
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #275 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:25pm » | |
come slow is a reference to a Massive Attack Song...Saturday Come Slow off of their new album Heglioland.
| |
|
clark
Human
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #276 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:25pm » | |
so has it been determined whether they are going to announce names throughout the night or wait until exactly midnight?
| |
|
clark
Human
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #277 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:26pm » | |
Pavement leading into Massive Attack seems a little disjointed, or am I reading that wrong?
| |
|
coren
Howling Windigo
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 313
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #278 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:30pm » | |
No, that's what's being suggested, Pavement then Massive Attack. Verrrry interesting choice.
| |
|
macdilla
Yapping Skunk Ape
member is offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 53
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #279 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:32pm » | |
I would see it more likely that they announce each day individually between sets saving the 3 headliners for the very end of the night.
| |
|
coren
Howling Windigo
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 313
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #280 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:32pm » | |
I wish you were right, but I think more likely is announcing by stage, or having the bands announce between songs.
| |
|
funnygrrl
Howling Windigo
member is offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 290
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #281 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:33pm » | |
I guess we will see if emstack is right about what he said in a couple of hours, No arcade fire, no soundgarden , pavement no headlining, a non us band after pavement and Massive attack a possibility. We will have to wait and see.
| |
|
macdilla
Yapping Skunk Ape
member is offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 53
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #282 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:34pm » | |
either way......I WANT TO KNOW NOW
| |
|
clark
Human
member is offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 40
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #283 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:35pm » | |
interestingly, Damon Albarn does the vocals to that Massive Attack song.
| |
|
emstack
Human
member is offline
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 12
| | Re: Sasquatch! 2010 Rumors
« Reply #284 on Feb 15, 2010, 10:37pm » | |
Feb 15, 2010, 10:23pm, alex wrote:| I look at it like this. With no credentials, names, etc., nobody will believe you until you prove that you're a credible source. This isn't a shot at you, it's just how the world works. I could send in hundreds of tips to CoS saying that I spoke to the lead singer of Band X about headlining Sasquatch, but unless they can trust that the info is accurate they won't print it. Same thing here. Nobody's giving you shit, but at the same time you can't expect people to take your word as gospel just because you say you've got a source. |
|
Like I say, I'm not expecting anybody to trust me or believe me. But I can't just keep apologizing. And I still don't get how nobody else thinks it's weird that a number of posters decided to only believe the hints my source gave and not the concrete facts. It just doesn't make much sense to only pick and choose from a particular rumor-monger's info, don't you think? If he's right about the hints, he's probably definitely right about the facts.
But whatever. Believe what you want I suppose. It's just a little weird.
| |
|
|
![[Home]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/home.png "[Home]")
![[New Topics]](http://images.proboards.com/menu/topics.png "[New Topics]")
![[Help]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/help.png "[Help]")
![[Search]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/search.png "[Search]")
![[Login]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/login.png "[Login]")
![[Register]](http://images.proboards.com/new/menu/register.png "[Register]")
![[Search This Thread]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/search2.png "[Search This Thread]")
![[Share Topic]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/share.png "[Share Topic]")
![[Print]](http://images.proboards.com/new/buttons/print.png "[Print]")
Logged