|
Author | Topic: 2009 Lineup (Read 71,568 times) |
darkstarcrashes Human
 member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.hippieshop.com/mas_assets/full/29340.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 49
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #585 on Feb 16, 2009, 6:16pm » | |
What time does the lineup drop? Midnight? or the Adam Corrolla show?
|
And I may be obliged to defend every love, every ending, or maybe there's no obligations now.--Paul Simon |
|
rawkhawk12 Human
 member is offline
Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 9
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #586 on Feb 16, 2009, 6:20pm » | |
adam corolla show. i'm still saying no doubt will headline.
| |
|
msbands Grunting Yowie
  member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://images.proboards.com/avatars/boyandmower.gif)
Bring Kay Kay & his mighty underground.
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
![[homepage] [homepage]](http://images.proboards.com/buttons/www_sm.gif) Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 134 Location: Bothell, Washington
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #587 on Feb 16, 2009, 6:23pm » | |
They better not, rawk.
About 7 AM tomorrow PST
|
|
|
rawkhawk12 Human
 member is offline
Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 9
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #588 on Feb 16, 2009, 6:30pm » | |
i hope not msbands, but the more i think about it the more i think it's going to happen. especially with no doubt's tour schedule release being delayed with no explanation. go on their site's message board, they're waiting for it to drop any time.
| |
|
lolocaustsquirrel Guest
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #589 on Feb 16, 2009, 7:44pm » | |
So Trent Reznor announced a NIN/Jane's tour today. Given that both are practically confirmed now, could this mean that NIN will subhead jane's and we could have an as yet unknown headliner?
| |
|
scough Man-Eating Higabon
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://fi.somethingawful.com/customtitles/title-ruffz.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 947 Location: WA
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #590 on Feb 16, 2009, 7:44pm » | |
if for some reason no doubt headlines, no worries, i'll just go chill at the dance tent or another stage. it's pretty much 99% certain that the "reunion band" rumored is jane's addiction, so hopefully we don't have to worry about no doubt taking a headlining spot.
| |
|
darkstarcrashes Human
 member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.hippieshop.com/mas_assets/full/29340.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 49
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #591 on Feb 16, 2009, 7:47pm » | |
^^hopefully we dont have to worry about janes addiction taking a headlining spot either.
|
And I may be obliged to defend every love, every ending, or maybe there's no obligations now.--Paul Simon |
|
seattleman123 Human
 member is offline
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 35
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #592 on Feb 16, 2009, 7:55pm » | |
Yes that would be awful! and please no Ben Harper. Hes good to listen to but not for a headliner. I really hipe its the Beasties and not him.
| |
|
darkstarcrashes Human
 member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.hippieshop.com/mas_assets/full/29340.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 49
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #593 on Feb 16, 2009, 8:06pm » | |
^^I would painfully sit through ben harper to listen to the Lips. 0h, wait I think I've done that before though. Beasties= 1baillout x better than BH.
|
And I may be obliged to defend every love, every ending, or maybe there's no obligations now.--Paul Simon |
|
jbeatsyall Human
 member is offline
Joined: Feb 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #594 on Feb 16, 2009, 9:34pm » | |
Franti will not be there.....in CA May 22 and 23rd. Anyone care? I do!! His shows are very "uplifting"! I was high though......
| |
|
ccoult Grunting Yowie
  member is offline
Joined: Feb 2008 Gender: Male  Posts: 187 Location: Victoria, B.C.
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #595 on Feb 16, 2009, 10:08pm » | |
First of all I don't really care...but how does that mean he won't be there?
| |
|
know ID yuh Abominable Snowman
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.gunthernet.com/images/thumbs/7.jpg)
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3,327 Location: Portland
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #596 on Feb 16, 2009, 10:19pm » | |
Feb 16, 2009, 1:36pm, interstateeight wrote: Feb 16, 2009, 1:11am, know ID yuh wrote:| If you step into 1996, you will also find every Sasquatch headliner since 2005. |
|
That's certainly a valid point, but I think there's something you're not considering: Yes, REM and The Cure and the Flaming Lips existed in the 1990's, but they all started in the 80's and have continued to put out records over the past twenty years. They are consistently GOOD musicians, and they manage to stay relevant -- ESPECIALLY the Lips.
On the other hand, Jane's Addiction's sound is SOLIDLY based in the 90's. It could not have existed in the 80's, nor in this decade. NIN is so firmly a part of the goth industrial whatfuckingever scene of 90's Hot Topic that I am honestly mystified that they have any new fans in 2009. As far as I'm concerned, Sasquatch might as well have booked Marilyn Manson and Limp Bizkit. |
|
Except Jane's Addiction put out two albums in the 80's, which including two of their biggest hits, the Mountain Song, and Jane Says. They put out two albums in the 90s, the first was in 1990, an album mostly written and recorded in 1989, the second in 1997, a rarities complilation including songs from the 80s, or live versions of songs performed in 1990. Their last album was a half reunion which came out in 2003.
It is easier to argue that they did absolutely nothing in the 90s over their sound is SOLIDLY based in the 90s.
As for existing this decade, most full reunion bands have not put out much lately, that is the definition of reunion. With Satellite Party and the Red Hot Chili Peckers, it is enough to say they have remained somewhat relevant.
As for Marilyn Manson, fuck yeah, that would be sick.
|
|
|
LumpSquatch Roaring Meh-Teh
     Maple Syrup Dick member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i43.tinypic.com/w72bm.jpg)
Joined: Dec 2011 Gender: Male  Posts: 5,336
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #597 on Feb 17, 2009, 1:21am » | |
Even though I'm sure it's not going to happen, I'm still going to keep hoping that Pavement is going to be the "legendary band with all original members", but, unfortunately it will probably be Jane's Addiction.
|
|
|
sweetadeline2489 Human
 member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://icons.iconator.com/772/ICONATOR_6594184f5bdf13f4b3843362ca4d39c7.jpg)
![[aim] [aim]](http://images.proboards.com/aim.gif)
Joined: Mar 2008 Gender: Female  Posts: 24 Location: Portland
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #598 on Feb 17, 2009, 1:27am » | |
Someone made a comment on Dustin's predictions on the blog tonight saying that they got a newsletter saying Ben Harper will be at Sasquatch! Does anyone know more about this?
| |
|
know ID yuh Abominable Snowman
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://www.gunthernet.com/images/thumbs/7.jpg)
Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 3,327 Location: Portland
|  | Re: 2009 Lineup « Reply #599 on Feb 17, 2009, 1:47am » | |
Oh sweetadeline, I can confirm Elliott Smith will not attend Sasquatch this year.
NIN, Jane's Addiction, Ben Harper, and Kings of Leon have been the highest rumored headliners over the past four days. It will probably happen.
|
|
|
|